Policy on the Use of AI
| 01 Purpose & scope | 04 Policy for editors |
| 02 Policy for authors | 05 General principles |
| 03 Policy for reviewers | 06 References |
|
01
|
Purpose & scope
|
This policy sets out the standards for the responsible, transparent, and ethical use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies ("AI tools") — such as large language models, chatbots, and AI-based image or data-visualization generators (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Claude, DALL·E) — throughout the research and publishing lifecycle of the journal. It applies to authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
AI may support scholarly work but can never replace human judgment, accountability, and responsibility. AI tools cannot be listed as an author or co-author, because authorship carries accountability that cannot be attributed to a non-human tool.
|
02
|
Policy for authors
|
| Allowed | Improving language, clarity, readability, and formatting of the manuscript (including code). |
| Allowed | Organizing or structuring manuscript content; background literature synthesis to identify research gaps. |
| Allowed | Checking a manuscript for completeness against journal guidelines prior to submission. |
- Generating substantial manuscript sections without genuine intellectual contribution.
- Fabricating or altering research data, results, or references — AI-generated citations must always be manually verified.
- Creating or altering primary research images (microscopy, histology, western blots, radiology scans, patient images).
- Generating graphical abstracts with general-purpose AI image tools.
Include a separate declaration before the reference list. Not required for basic grammar/spelling checks or accessibility-only assistive technology.
AI tools must never be listed as an author or co-author. Authorship requires the capacity to take responsibility, be held accountable, and approve the final version for submission.
|
03
|
Policy for reviewers
|
Manuscripts under review are confidential documents. Reviewers must not upload a submitted manuscript, or any part of it, into a public or non-private AI tool, as this may breach the authors' confidentiality, proprietary rights, and data privacy.
AI tools may be used only in a supportive capacity — for example, to improve the language of a review report or assist with a general background literature search — and never as a substitute for the reviewer's own critical scientific judgment. Reviewers should verify that any AI tool used is "private" (does not retain, reuse, or train on submitted content) before use.
|
04
|
Policy for editors
|
Editors must not upload submitted manuscripts, or any part of them, into an AI tool — the same confidentiality and data-privacy considerations that apply to reviewers apply here.
AI tools may only support editorial tasks (e.g., improving the language of decision letters, background literature checks), never replace an editor's independent scientific judgment or final editorial decision. Editors must use only private, non-data-retaining AI tools for any task involving manuscript-related content.
Journals should inform authors, through the Guide for Authors and editorial communications, how AI tools may be used in a supportive capacity during the editorial process.
|
05
|
General principles
|
|
06
|
References
|
Both publishers state their AI policies are under continuous review; check the source pages above for the latest versions before finalizing journal-specific guidelines.
| Premiere Educandum — Policy on the Use of AI | Adopted August 2026 |